Login Accedi ^
Italiano
Registrati
Registrati su Weekeep! Trova i tuoi amici di Facebook, organizza i tuoi viaggi e visita oltre 1.000.000 eventi in tutto il mondo!
Accedi con Facebook
Accedi con Google+
Facebook Google+
X
RISULTATI
MAPPA
DETTAGLIO
$mapTile_Titolo
$mapTile_Immagine
$mapTile_Indirizzo
$mapTile_LastMinute
$mapTile_Durata
Località
Dormire
Mangiare
Offerte Speciali
Eventi
Mostra tutte le 7 categorieMostra meno categorie
Mostra tutte le 11 LOCALITAMostra meno località
Mostra tutte le 23 sistemazioniMostra meno sistemazioni
PREZZO : da € a
OSPITI :
CAMERE :
STELLE : da a
Mostra tutte le 13 categorieMostra meno categorie
Mostra tutte le 13 categorieMostra meno categorie

PhiloNeuro Seminar Series - Matteo Colombo

Neurophilosophy Via Festa del Perdono, 7 , Milano, Italia
Google+

Speaker: Matteo Colombo (TILPS)

Title: Bayesian cognitive science, inference to the best explanatory framework, and the value of specialization

Abstract: It is widely assumed that the Bayesian framework enjoys special epistemic virtues over alternative frameworks for representing and dealing with uncertainty. If this framework enjoys these epistemic virtues, then cognitive scientists have reason to privilege it for explaining phenomena whose production involves uncertainty. However, it is far from obvious that the Bayesian framework actually enjoys such special epistemic virtues. The adoption of this framework cannot be justified by simply appealing to its superiority in allowing us to effectively tackle problems of uncertain inference. Rather, what both justifies the widespread adoption of the Bayesian framework in cognitive science is related to the fact that, compared to alternatives, it currently comprises a richer body of tools that can be opportunistically exploited. Exploitation of existing models and tools can foster specialization, and specialization can yield relatively higher epistemic utility for both individual scientists and the cognitive science community as a whole. Thus, the case of current Bayesian cognitive science illustrates three general points about the rationality and dynamics of theory choice in science: first, the utility of adopting a scientific framework partly depends on the level of specialization it can foster, second, this level of specialization is a function of the adoption of the same framework by others; third and finally, exploiting an existing framework is often the rational thing to do for scientists.

Room: TBA

More info: http://neurophilosophy.unimi.it/index.php/next-philoneuroseminars/icalrepeat.detail/2014/06/10/167/31/matteo-colombo

Veniteci a trovare
il 10 giugno 2014

Che Tempo fa

Recensioni

Caricamento...
Caricamento...
In questa zona i nostri Partner offrono: